HVAC PT ChartsVerified saturation data · 61 refrigerants

R-407C vs R-410A: Two HFC Era Refrigerants, Different Roles

R-407C is the R-22 retrofit HFC blend (close-to-R-22 pressure envelope, 11°F glide); R-410A is the HFC blend designed for purpose-built new equipment (~60% higher pressures, near-azeotropic). Same POE lubricant for both. Not interchangeable in any equipment.

HFC blendA1Non-flammable
GWP (AR5)
1774
Lubricant
POE
Glide @ 0°C
-11.0°F
HFC blendA1Non-flammable
GWP (AR5)
2088
Lubricant
POE
Glide @ 0°C
-0.2°F

PT curves, overlaid

Solid line = bubble, dashed = dew where the refrigerant has significant temperature glide.

Pressure comparison at service temperatures

Side-by-side pressure values at common service temperatures, computed from CoolProp 7.2.0. Useful for retrofit feasibility — pressure deltas within ±20% typically allow drop-in compatible service equipment; larger deltas require component pressure-rating review.

Saturation pressure (PSIG) at common service temperatures
TemperatureR-407CR-410AΔ vs R-407C
-20°F14 PSIG26 PSIG+91.6%
0°F29 PSIG48 PSIG+64.2%
40°F80 PSIG119 PSIG+48.0%
70°F141 PSIG202 PSIG+43.6%
95°F209 PSIG296 PSIG+41.5%
120°F299 PSIG419 PSIG+40.5%
Pressure delta: R-410A vs R-407C (% deviation)0%-101%-50%+50%+101%-20°F+91.6%0°F+64.2%40°F+48.0%70°F+43.6%95°F+41.5%120°F+40.5%

Pressure delta visualization: positive = R-410A runs higher than R-407C; negative = lower. Service equipment pressure rating matters when delta exceeds ±20% on the discharge side. For R-407C (zeotropic blend) bubble pressure is shown; for R-410A same rule applies.

Property differences side by side

Key differences at a glance
  • GWP impact: R-407C = 1,774, R-410A = 2,088 (+18% vs R-407C). GWP delta is modest.
  • Lubricant: R-407C: POE; R-410A: POE. Same lubricant family — no oil change needed.
  • Glide change: R-407C glide = 11.0°F; R-410A glide = 0.2°F. Service measurement (superheat / subcooling) needs dew/bubble curve awareness for the higher-glide blend.

Properties side by side

PropertyR-407CR-410A
Typehfc blendhfc blend
ASHRAE classA1A1
Composition23.0% R-32 / 25.0% R-125 / 52.0% R-134a50.0% R-32 / 50.0% R-125
GWP (AR5)17742088
ODP00
LubricantPOEPOE
Boiling point @ 1 atm-43.6°C-51.4°C
Critical point86.1°C / 658 PSIGBlend (locus, not point)
Temp glide-11.02°F-0.19°F
AIM Act affectedYesYes

Choose R-407C if…

Retrofitting existing R-22 equipment for continued service. R-407C's near-R-22 pressure envelope allows the existing equipment chassis (compressor, condenser, evaporator, line set) to operate at design pressures with the new refrigerant. Glide management is the trade-off; oil change from mineral to POE is required.

Choose R-410A if…

Servicing equipment originally designed for R-410A (new equipment 2010-2024). R-410A's pressure envelope is fundamentally different from R-22's (~60% higher), so R-410A equipment is purpose-designed for that envelope and cannot accept R-407C. Both new and retrofit applications are separate equipment categories.

When neither is ideal

For new equipment installations from 2025 onward, the choice is R-32 or R-454B (both A2L, GWP 675 and 466 respectively). Both R-407C and R-410A are HFC blends facing EPA AIM Act phase-down for new equipment categories. R-407C and R-410A remain legal for service of existing equipment indefinitely, but new equipment specification has moved on.

Retrofit and transition

These two refrigerants serve different roles in the post-R-22 HFC era and cannot be cross-applied between equipment classes.

**R-407C was designed as an R-22 retrofit.** Its 23/25/52 R-32/R-125/R-134a composition was engineered to match R-22's pressure envelope across the operating range — R-22-rated components handle R-407C without redesign. The 11°F temperature glide is the trade-off: it requires dew-curve superheat measurement and bubble-curve subcooling, and limits fixed-orifice system performance. The mandatory mineral-oil-to-POE oil change is the other major retrofit task.

**R-410A was designed for purpose-built new equipment.** Its 50/50 R-32/R-125 composition is near-azeotropic (effectively zero glide, simplifies service) but produces ~60% higher pressures than R-22 across the envelope. R-410A equipment uses 800 PSI-rated manifold gauges, thicker-walled tubing, and compressor designs optimized for the higher pressures. R-22 equipment is not pressure-rated for R-410A operation; conversely R-410A equipment is over-rated for R-407C and would operate inefficiently with R-407C charge.

Neither retrofits to the other. R-407C → R-410A would require complete equipment replacement (pressure incompatibility). R-410A → R-407C would technically work pressure-wise but with significant efficiency loss and no benefit (both are AIM Act-affected HFC blends).

For systems with either refrigerant: continued service with the existing refrigerant is fine while reclaim supply exists. For major work or 15+ year-old equipment, full replacement with R-32 or R-454B is the durable answer.

Regulatory and transition context

Both refrigerants sit in an active regulatory transition driven by climate-impact rules. The transitions affect availability, pricing, and new-equipment specification.

  • EPA AIM Act (40 CFR Part 84): US HFC production / import phase-down. Cap declines from 90% allocation (2022) to 15% by 2036. One or both refrigerants here are AIM Act-affected. New residential AC equipment over 700 GWP prohibited as of 2025.
  • EU F-Gas Regulation (517/2014, updated 2024/573): European stationary refrigeration GWP cap typically 150 (much tighter than AIM Act). Drives earlier adoption of very-low-GWP options in European markets.
  • Kigali Amendment to Montreal Protocol (2016): international HFC phase-down framework (198 countries). The AIM Act and EU F-Gas are regional implementations. Schedules differ by country group.
  • ASHRAE 34-2022: safety classification (A1, A2L, A3, B1, B2L). For A2L refrigerants like R-32, R-454B, R-454C, R-455A: equipment must be A2L-certified, charge limits per IEC 60335-2-40 apply.

Standard transition procedure — R-407C → R-410A

Step-by-step service procedure for transitioning an existing R-407C system to R-410A, derived from the property differences above. Always cross-check equipment OEM service literature for the specific equipment being serviced. The steps below codify EPA Section 608 requirements (recovery, evacuation, documentation) plus refrigerant-specific accommodations for lubricant, safety class, pressure envelope, and glide differences. Skipping any of the regulatory steps (leak check, recovery, evacuation, documentation) creates compliance liability; skipping refrigerant-specific accommodations creates equipment-failure risk.

Field-service transition procedure (R-407C → R-410A)
  1. EPA Section 608 leak-check first.Verify the existing system isn't leaking before any work. If it's leaking, find and repair the leak — adding refrigerant (existing or new) to a leaking system violates 40 CFR Part 82.
  2. Recover R-407C. Use a recovery machine rated for A1refrigerants. Recover into properly-labeled cylinders; don't mix recovered R-407C with virgin or recovered R-410A (cross-contamination invalidates reclaim).
  3. Lubricant compatible — no oil change required. Both refrigerants run on POE lubricant family. Keep the existing oil charge; just replace the filter-drier and any compromised seals.
  4. Replace filter-drier. Install a new drier rated for R-410A (POElubricant). Filter-driers are single-use after exposure to a refrigerant; the old drier may have absorbed contaminants you don't want carrying into the new charge.
  5. Pressure-test and evacuate to ≤500 microns. Pressure-test with dry nitrogen to verify no leaks. Pull deep vacuum and hold ≥30 minutes with vacuum pump isolated to confirm no leak-back. This step is non-negotiable — non-condensables (air, moisture) trapped in the system raise discharge pressure and damage the compressor.
  6. Charge R-410A by weight to nameplate — adjusted for the +42% pressure difference vs R-407C. Use a calibrated recovery / charging scale. Charging by gauge feel produces frequent overcharge errors.
  7. Verify with SH and SC at steady state. R-410A has minimal glide (pure or near-azeotrope), so the bubble = dew curve and standard PT chart math applies. Target SC = 8-12°F for TXV systems; target SH per OEM nameplate.
  8. Document and label. Update the equipment data plate to reflect R-410A. EPA Section 608 requires records of refrigerant added / recovered; OEM warranty may require documentation of approved-refrigerant substitution.

Lifecycle and operational context

Beyond the per-service-call decision, the R-407CR-410A choice sits inside a broader regulatory and lifecycle context. The transition direction (which is the predecessor, which is the successor) is driven by climate policy and the AIM Act phase-down, not technical preference alone.

Lifecycle and regulatory snapshot
  • GWP profile: R-407C = 1,774 GWP (AR5); R-410A = 2,088 GWP. Switching from R-407C to R-410A increases direct refrigerant climate impact by 18%.
  • AIM Act exposure: Both refrigerants are subject to the AIM Act phase-down (HFC allocation declining toward 15% of baseline by 2036). One or both refrigerants exceed the 700 GWP cap for new residential AC equipment (in effect since January 1, 2025).
  • EU F-Gas Regulation: Both refrigerants exceed the EU F-Gas 150 GWP cap for new stationary refrigeration. Selection in European market favors very-low-GWP HFOs and natural refrigerants.
  • Service supply outlook: Service supply of AIM Act-affected refrigerants persists during phase-down via reclaimed and allocated production, with prices rising as supply tightens. Plan for refrigerant cost escalation over equipment lifetime.
  • TEWI / LCCP framing: Total Equivalent Warming Impact accounts for both direct refrigerant emissions (leakage, end-of-life) and indirect emissions from equipment energy consumption. For HVAC equipment with ≤5% annual leak rate, indirect emissions typically dominate TEWI by 80-90% — meaning equipment efficiency matters more than refrigerant GWP for total climate impact. For commercial refrigeration with higher leak rates, the balance can tip toward favoring low-GWP refrigerants.

Regulatory sources: EPA AIM Act (40 CFR Part 84), EU F-Gas Regulation 517/2014 and update 2024/573, Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol (2016), Japan Fluorocarbon Emissions Control Law. GWP values per IPCC AR5 (2013) WG-I Table 8.A.1.

Service implications — R-407C → R-410A

What a service technician needs to know when transitioning from R-407Cto R-410A (or comparing them for new equipment specification). Two real-world scenarios show how the difference plays out in practice.

1
Service problemR-407C ↔ R-410A

Pressure envelope check for R-407C → R-410A

Scenario · Field tech needs to know: do R-407C service tools handle R-410A, or does the pressure delta require new equipment? PT chart comparison at service temperatures gives the answer.

Comparison
TempR-407CR-410AΔ
40°F80 PSIG119 PSIG+48.0%
70°F141 PSIG202 PSIG+43.6%
95°F209 PSIG296 PSIG+41.5%
Action required · Large pressure delta — equipment changes required
Pressure delta exceeds typical retrofit-acceptable margin. Component pressure ratings need engineering review; full equipment replacement is often the right answer rather than retrofit.
Fix
Component pressure ratings must be verified for the higher-pressure refrigerant. R-410A-rated service equipment (800 PSI gauges) handles many newer refrigerants, but R-744 (transcritical) requires 3000+ PSI components.
2
Service problemR-407C ↔ R-410A

Service-side implications: lubricant and safety

Scenario · Beyond pressure envelope, the switch from R-407C to R-410A affects lubricant, safety class, and operating procedure.

Comparison
ConcernR-407CR-410AAction
LubricantPOEPOENo change
Safety classA1A1No change
Glide11.0°F0.2°FCurve awareness
OK · No major service-side changes
Service procedures essentially the same. Retrofit is mostly a refrigerant swap without equipment changes.

When to use which tool for this comparison

Frequently asked

Are R-407C and R-410A interchangeable?

No. They have very different pressure envelopes — R-410A operates at ~60% higher pressures than R-407C across the operating range. R-410A-rated equipment is over-built for R-407C operation; R-407C-rated equipment (typically R-22 retrofit installations) would fail catastrophically if R-410A were introduced. Service and retrofit between the two requires complete equipment replacement, not refrigerant substitution.

Why was R-410A chosen for new equipment instead of R-407C?

R-410A is near-azeotropic (no glide), making it operationally simpler than R-407C in new-equipment context. R-410A's higher volumetric capacity allows smaller compressors and more compact equipment. R-407C's main advantage — close pressure match to R-22 — only matters for retrofit applications, not for purpose-built new equipment. The industry chose R-410A for new equipment starting ~2010 when R-22 was banned for new manufacturing.

What's the GWP of each?

R-407C: 1774 per IPCC AR5. R-410A: 2088. Both well above the AIM Act 700-GWP threshold for new residential AC equipment. Both face phase-down restrictions for new equipment beginning 2025. The GWP difference (315 GWP-units, about 18%) is meaningful but neither is acceptable for new equipment going forward — both are transitional HFC technologies between R-22 (HCFC) and modern A2L (R-32, R-454B).

Why does R-407C have glide while R-410A doesn't?

Composition design. R-407C is a ternary blend (R-32/R-125/R-134a at 23/25/52) where the components have substantially different vapor pressures, producing ~11°F glide. R-410A is a binary blend (R-32/R-125 at 50/50) where the two components have similar vapor pressures, producing near-azeotropic behavior with effectively zero glide. The glide difference is intentional — R-407C's composition was chosen for R-22 pressure match; R-410A's composition was chosen for azeotropic simplicity in new equipment.

Do R-407C and R-410A use the same lubricant?

Yes — both use polyolester (POE) oil. The lubricant compatibility means you don't need to drain and refill POE oil when switching between them on a test rig or research system. But equipment design differences (pressure, capacity) make refrigerant substitution between them impractical in production equipment regardless of lubricant compatibility.

Should I install R-410A equipment in 2026?

Generally no — under the EPA AIM Act, new residential AC equipment manufactured 2025+ must be A2L (R-32 or R-454B) for many categories. R-410A equipment is increasingly unavailable for new installations. The path is R-32 or R-454B for new equipment; reclaimed R-410A remains available for service of existing equipment through the late 2030s.

How do I tell R-407C from R-410A on a system?

Check the equipment data plate — it explicitly states refrigerant type. Service cylinders are color-coded differently: R-407C is medium brown; R-410A is pink. R-22 retrofit installations (where R-407C is most commonly found) typically have a retrofit conversion label on the equipment. Equipment manufactured 2010-2024 for new residential AC installations is almost always R-410A; equipment from R-22 retrofit programs is often R-407C, R-422D, or R-438A.

R-407C full reference

PT chart, properties, retrofit guidance.

R-410A full reference

PT chart, properties, retrofit guidance.

Sources & provenance

  • Saturation pressures from CoolProp 7.2.0 (Bell, Wronski, Quoilin, Lemort 2014, doi:10.1021/ie4033999)
  • Safety classifications per ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 34-2022
  • GWP values per IPCC AR5 (2013) Working Group I, Table 8.A.1
  • Regulatory context: EPA AIM Act (40 CFR Part 84), EU F-Gas Regulation 517/2014 + 2024/573, Kigali Amendment to Montreal Protocol
  • R-407C: CoolProp 7.2.0 R407C.mix
  • R-410A: CoolProp 7.2.0 R410A.mix
  • Records generated 2026-06-05