HVAC PT ChartsVerified saturation data · 61 refrigerants

R-22 vs R-407C: The Drop-In Retrofit That Isn't Quite

R-407C is a ternary HFC blend (23/25/52 R-32/R-125/R-134a) designed as an R-22 retrofit. Similar pressure envelope, similar capacity, A1 safety class — but requires POE oil instead of R-22's mineral oil, and has ~11°F temperature glide that affects TXV behavior and superheat measurement.

HCFCA1Non-flammable
GWP (AR5)
1810
Lubricant
MO, AB
Glide @ 0°C
0.0°F
HFC blendA1Non-flammable
GWP (AR5)
1774
Lubricant
POE
Glide @ 0°C
-11.0°F

PT curves, overlaid

Solid line = bubble, dashed = dew where the refrigerant has significant temperature glide.

Pressure comparison at service temperatures

Side-by-side pressure values at common service temperatures, computed from CoolProp 7.2.0. Useful for retrofit feasibility — pressure deltas within ±20% typically allow drop-in compatible service equipment; larger deltas require component pressure-rating review.

Saturation pressure (PSIG) at common service temperatures
TemperatureR-22R-407CΔ vs R-22
-20°F10 PSIG14 PSIG+34.6%
0°F24 PSIG29 PSIG+22.7%
40°F69 PSIG80 PSIG+17.0%
70°F121 PSIG141 PSIG+15.7%
95°F182 PSIG209 PSIG+15.2%
120°F260 PSIG299 PSIG+14.9%
Pressure delta: R-407C vs R-22 (% deviation)0%-38%-19%+19%+38%-20°F+34.6%0°F+22.7%40°F+17.0%70°F+15.7%95°F+15.2%120°F+14.9%

Pressure delta visualization: positive = R-407C runs higher than R-22; negative = lower. Service equipment pressure rating matters when delta exceeds ±20% on the discharge side. For R-22 (zeotropic blend) bubble pressure is shown; for R-407C same rule applies.

Property differences side by side

Key differences at a glance
  • GWP impact: R-22 = 1,810, R-407C = 1,774 (-2% vs R-22). GWP delta is modest.
  • Lubricant: R-22: MO/AB; R-407C: POE. Retrofit requires oil change (mineral oil to POE).
  • Glide change: R-22 glide = 0.0°F; R-407C glide = 11.0°F. Service measurement (superheat / subcooling) needs dew/bubble curve awareness for the higher-glide blend.
  • AIM Act status: R-407C is affected by AIM Act phase-down; the other is not. Drives new-equipment specification decisions in US market.

Properties side by side

PropertyR-22R-407C
Typehcfchfc blend
ASHRAE classA1A1
CompositionPure23.0% R-32 / 25.0% R-125 / 52.0% R-134a
GWP (AR5)18101774
ODP0.0550
LubricantMO, ABPOE
Boiling point @ 1 atm-40.8°C-43.6°C
Critical point96.2°C / 709 PSIG86.1°C / 658 PSIG
Temp glide0.00°F-11.02°F
AIM Act affectedNoYes

Choose R-22 if…

Servicing existing R-22 equipment with original R-22. Reclaimed R-22 remains legal under EPA rules. The lubricant (mineral oil) and equipment design stay matched to what was originally specified. Higher refrigerant cost is the trade-off.

Choose R-407C if…

Retrofitting an R-22 system where the oil-change procedure is acceptable and where the equipment owner wants to be off the increasingly-expensive reclaimed R-22 supply. R-407C delivers within 95% of R-22 capacity, operates at similar pressures, and uses commodity-priced HFC supply.

When neither is ideal

For systems requiring major work or 15+ years old, full system replacement with new R-32 or R-454B equipment is typically more cost-effective than R-22 service OR R-407C retrofit. New equipment delivers 20-30% efficiency improvement vs R-22-era systems and eliminates the AIM Act phase-down risk that affects R-407C too (R-407C GWP 1774, above the 700-GWP threshold for many new equipment categories).

Retrofit and transition

R-22 to R-407C is the most common R-22 retrofit path when oil change is acceptable. The procedure is well-documented and the capacity match is within 5% across typical operating conditions.

**Retrofit procedure:**

1. **Recover R-22** to a dedicated R-22 recovery cylinder. Document recovered weight. 2. **Remove mineral oil** through 2-3 oil-change cycles. Each cycle: drain compressor crankcase, refill with POE oil of correct viscosity, run system briefly, drain again. Target residual mineral oil below 5% (verify with oil analysis if critical). 3. **Replace filter-drier** with HFC-compatible model (the desiccant in R-22-era driers may be incompatible with POE oil). 4. **Pull vacuum** to 500 microns and hold 30 minutes to verify dry, leak-tight system. 5. **Charge R-407C** by weight at approximately 95% of the original R-22 nameplate (R-407C is slightly more dense). For systems with significant line lengths, use the [refrigerant charge calculator](/refrigerant-charge-calculator/) to adjust for line set. 6. **Verify capacity** at design conditions. Expect 90-95% of original R-22 capacity at the same ambient. 7. **Adjust TXV** if necessary — R-407C's 11°F temperature glide may require slight adjustment for stable operation.

**Glide considerations.** R-407C has substantial temperature glide (~11°F at typical evaporator pressures). For TXV systems this generally works without modification — the TXV controls to evaporator-outlet superheat which uses the dew curve naturally. For fixed-orifice systems the glide creates more variable operation across the evaporator; capacity is reduced ~5% compared to R-22 in fixed-orifice equipment.

**Service measurement.** Use the dew curve for superheat (suction-line measurement) and the bubble curve for subcooling (liquid-line measurement). The [superheat calculator](/superheat-calculator/) and [subcooling calculator](/subcooling-calculator/) handle this automatically when R-407C is selected.

Regulatory and transition context

Both refrigerants sit in an active regulatory transition driven by climate-impact rules. The transitions affect availability, pricing, and new-equipment specification.

  • EPA AIM Act (40 CFR Part 84): US HFC production / import phase-down. Cap declines from 90% allocation (2022) to 15% by 2036. One or both refrigerants here are AIM Act-affected. New residential AC equipment over 700 GWP prohibited as of 2025.
  • EU F-Gas Regulation (517/2014, updated 2024/573): European stationary refrigeration GWP cap typically 150 (much tighter than AIM Act). Drives earlier adoption of very-low-GWP options in European markets.
  • Kigali Amendment to Montreal Protocol (2016): international HFC phase-down framework (198 countries). The AIM Act and EU F-Gas are regional implementations. Schedules differ by country group.
  • ASHRAE 34-2022: safety classification (A1, A2L, A3, B1, B2L). For A2L refrigerants like R-32, R-454B, R-454C, R-455A: equipment must be A2L-certified, charge limits per IEC 60335-2-40 apply.

Standard transition procedure — R-22 → R-407C

Step-by-step service procedure for transitioning an existing R-22 system to R-407C, derived from the property differences above. Always cross-check equipment OEM service literature for the specific equipment being serviced. The steps below codify EPA Section 608 requirements (recovery, evacuation, documentation) plus refrigerant-specific accommodations for lubricant, safety class, pressure envelope, and glide differences. Skipping any of the regulatory steps (leak check, recovery, evacuation, documentation) creates compliance liability; skipping refrigerant-specific accommodations creates equipment-failure risk.

Field-service transition procedure (R-22 → R-407C)
  1. EPA Section 608 leak-check first.Verify the existing system isn't leaking before any work. If it's leaking, find and repair the leak — adding refrigerant (existing or new) to a leaking system violates 40 CFR Part 82.
  2. Recover R-22. Use a recovery machine rated for A1refrigerants. Recover into properly-labeled cylinders; don't mix recovered R-22 with virgin or recovered R-407C (cross-contamination invalidates reclaim).
  3. Drain MO lubricant and flush. R-22 runs on MO/AB; R-407C requires POE. Drain the compressor crankcase, accumulator, and any oil traps. Flush the system with a compatible flush solvent or run POE lubricant through the system and re-drain to clear residual MO. Mixing mineral oil with POE in an HFC system produces oil-return failures within hours of operation.
  4. Replace filter-drier. Install a new drier rated for R-407C (POElubricant). Filter-driers are single-use after exposure to a refrigerant; the old drier may have absorbed contaminants you don't want carrying into the new charge.
  5. Pressure-test and evacuate to ≤500 microns. Pressure-test with dry nitrogen to verify no leaks. Pull deep vacuum and hold ≥30 minutes with vacuum pump isolated to confirm no leak-back. This step is non-negotiable — non-condensables (air, moisture) trapped in the system raise discharge pressure and damage the compressor.
  6. Charge R-407C by weight to nameplate — adjusted for the +15% pressure difference vs R-22. Use a calibrated recovery / charging scale. Charging by gauge feel produces frequent overcharge errors.
  7. Verify with SH and SC at steady state. R-407C is zeotropic with 11.0°F glide — use the dew curve at suction for SH, bubble curve at discharge for SC. Wrong-curve selection introduces error equal to the glide. Target SC = 8-12°F for TXV systems; target SH per OEM nameplate.
  8. Document and label. Update the equipment data plate to reflect R-407C. EPA Section 608 requires records of refrigerant added / recovered; OEM warranty may require documentation of approved-refrigerant substitution.

Lifecycle and operational context

Beyond the per-service-call decision, the R-22R-407C choice sits inside a broader regulatory and lifecycle context. The transition direction (which is the predecessor, which is the successor) is driven by climate policy and the AIM Act phase-down, not technical preference alone.

Lifecycle and regulatory snapshot
  • GWP profile: R-22 = 1,810 GWP (AR5); R-407C = 1,774 GWP. Switching from R-22 to R-407C reduces direct refrigerant climate impact by 2%.
  • AIM Act exposure: R-407C is AIM Act-affected; R-22 is not — the transition increases regulatory exposure (unusual direction). One or both refrigerants exceed the 700 GWP cap for new residential AC equipment (in effect since January 1, 2025).
  • EU F-Gas Regulation: Both refrigerants exceed the EU F-Gas 150 GWP cap for new stationary refrigeration. Selection in European market favors very-low-GWP HFOs and natural refrigerants.
  • Service supply outlook: Service supply of AIM Act-affected refrigerants persists during phase-down via reclaimed and allocated production, with prices rising as supply tightens. Plan for refrigerant cost escalation over equipment lifetime.
  • TEWI / LCCP framing: Total Equivalent Warming Impact accounts for both direct refrigerant emissions (leakage, end-of-life) and indirect emissions from equipment energy consumption. For HVAC equipment with ≤5% annual leak rate, indirect emissions typically dominate TEWI by 80-90% — meaning equipment efficiency matters more than refrigerant GWP for total climate impact. For commercial refrigeration with higher leak rates, the balance can tip toward favoring low-GWP refrigerants.

Regulatory sources: EPA AIM Act (40 CFR Part 84), EU F-Gas Regulation 517/2014 and update 2024/573, Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol (2016), Japan Fluorocarbon Emissions Control Law. GWP values per IPCC AR5 (2013) WG-I Table 8.A.1.

Service implications — R-22 → R-407C

What a service technician needs to know when transitioning from R-22to R-407C (or comparing them for new equipment specification). Two real-world scenarios show how the difference plays out in practice.

1
Service problemR-22 ↔ R-407C

Pressure envelope check for R-22 → R-407C

Scenario · Field tech needs to know: do R-22 service tools handle R-407C, or does the pressure delta require new equipment? PT chart comparison at service temperatures gives the answer.

Comparison
TempR-22R-407CΔ
40°F69 PSIG80 PSIG+17.0%
70°F121 PSIG141 PSIG+15.7%
95°F182 PSIG209 PSIG+15.2%
Investigate · Moderate pressure delta — standard retrofit
Pressure delta is moderate. Standard retrofit procedure applies (recover, change filter-drier, evacuate, recharge by weight). Service equipment pressure rating margin should be checked but typically adequate.
Fix
Standard retrofit procedure with current service equipment. Verify final SH/SC after charging.
2
Service problemR-22 ↔ R-407C

Service-side implications: lubricant and safety

Scenario · Beyond pressure envelope, the switch from R-22 to R-407C affects lubricant, safety class, and operating procedure.

Comparison
ConcernR-22R-407CAction
LubricantMO/ABPOEOil change required
Safety classA1A1No change
Glide0.0°F11.0°FCurve awareness
Investigate · Lubricant change required for retrofit
Standard HFC retrofit: drain old oil, flush system, replace with new lubricant family, charge by weight.

When to use which tool for this comparison

Frequently asked

Can I add R-407C to a partially-charged R-22 system without recovering and recharging?

No. Mixing R-407C with R-22 produces a non-standard blend with unpredictable composition (R-407C is itself a blend that fractionates if charged as vapor). The mineral oil in the R-22 system is also incompatible with R-407C's required POE lubricant. Full recovery, oil change, vacuum, and recharge is mandatory for the retrofit to work reliably.

What's R-407C's GWP and why does it matter?

GWP 1774 (IPCC AR5) — below R-22's 1810 and below R-410A's 2088, but well above modern low-GWP A2L alternatives. Under the EPA AIM Act R-407C is restricted for many new equipment categories starting in 2025-2026. R-407C remains legal for service of existing equipment indefinitely, but for new R-22 retrofits the choice should account for the limited remaining regulatory runway of R-407C.

Why does R-407C have temperature glide while R-22 has none?

R-22 is a pure refrigerant (single molecule, chlorodifluoromethane) — bubble and dew points are identical. R-407C is a ternary blend of R-32, R-125, and R-134a in 23/25/52 mass proportions; the components have different vapor pressures, so the blend has bubble (saturated liquid) and dew (saturated vapor) temperatures that differ by ~11°F at typical pressures. This is normal for zeotropic blends and is accounted for in TXV-based equipment design.

Will my R-22 equipment work with R-407C?

Most R-22 equipment is compatible with R-407C with the oil change and filter-drier replacement described above. The pressure envelope is similar enough (R-407C is ~5-10% higher than R-22) that R-22-rated components handle it. Check the equipment OEM's R-407C retrofit guidance — some specific equipment models have published retrofit procedures or restrictions.

How much capacity will I lose with R-407C retrofit?

Typically 5-10%. R-407C has slightly lower volumetric capacity than R-22 at the same operating conditions. The reduction is more pronounced in fixed-orifice systems (because the glide affects evaporator behavior) than in TXV systems. For most residential and light commercial applications the capacity reduction is acceptable but worth verifying against the load.

What lubricant does R-407C use?

Polyolester (POE) oil. Mineral oil and alkylbenzene (AB) are incompatible. The R-22 to R-407C retrofit requires oil change as documented in the procedure above. POE oil is hygroscopic — it absorbs water aggressively — so vacuum and filter-drier replacement are critical to prevent moisture damage.

R-22 full reference

PT chart, properties, retrofit guidance.

R-407C full reference

PT chart, properties, retrofit guidance.

Sources & provenance

  • Saturation pressures from CoolProp 7.2.0 (Bell, Wronski, Quoilin, Lemort 2014, doi:10.1021/ie4033999)
  • Safety classifications per ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 34-2022
  • GWP values per IPCC AR5 (2013) Working Group I, Table 8.A.1
  • Regulatory context: EPA AIM Act (40 CFR Part 84), EU F-Gas Regulation 517/2014 + 2024/573, Kigali Amendment to Montreal Protocol
  • R-22: CoolProp 7.2.0 R22
  • R-407C: CoolProp 7.2.0 R407C.mix
  • Records generated 2026-06-05